Pour les jeunes oisifs cherchant à se rassurer sur leurs virilité et par l’occasion détruire l’un des arguments fer de lance des métissophiles :

Voici THE SOLUTION : la plus grande enquête sur tout ce qui se rapporte de près ou de loin au penis/bite/teub

Seul les passages les plus intéressants ont été traduits ( en bleu )

PENIS SIZE AND RACE (Taille du pénis et race )

Since the release of the fifth edition, the number of Black and Hispanic participants has not substantially increased. Because of the continued low sample sizes therefore, the results reported below concerning the aforementioned groups must be considered tentative, pending a larger number of responses.

Surprisingly, it would appear from Figure 5, that contrary to popular myth, Black males have shorter erect lengths than their Caucasian counterparts. However, due to the small sample size and large variation in lengths, this “difference” is not statistically significant. The average flaccid length among Blacks however was 93.8mm (3.7″) compared to 87.7mm (3.4″) for Caucasians, which may be responsible for the impression that Black men have greater erect dimensions. Again, I emphasize that these observations must remain tentative.

Avec surprise il apparait sur la figure 5 , que contrairement au mythe populairement accepté , les Noirs ont des penis plus petits que leurs homologues blancs. Cependant cette différence n’est pas statistiquement signifiante dut à l’echantillon de taille réduite et aux légères différences en taille et en épaisseur . La taille moyenne au repos est cependant plus importantes pour les Noirs avec 9.38 cm comparé au 8.77 cm des caucasiens , ce qui serait responsable de l’idée que les noirs ont des meilleures dimensions en érections (…)

There was a significant difference in length between Caucasians and both Hispanic and East Asians (those of Chinese, Japanese, Korean or Vietnamese descent). Whereas with Hispanics, such a difference was limited to erect length only, with East Asians all five measurements were statistically lower in comparison to Caucasians. Although part of this difference may be due to the shorter stature of East Asians (see “On Correlations” below), height matched comparisons with Caucasian subjects nevertheless failed to alter this finding.

Figure 6. Perception de la taille du sexe selon les groupes raciaux

The figure to the left summarizes the results of question 44, in which men were asked to rate members of their own ethnic group with respect to size. Of particular interest was the response of East Asian subjects. Among East Asians residing in the East, 31% felt that they were generally of modest size, compared to 56% of those living in the West. This is probably due to the fact that Western countries tend to be more racially diverse, allowing for greater interaction and hence comparison with men of different ethnic backgrounds.

It is also interesting to note that the vast majority of Black subjects stated that they tended to be well endowed; an opinion which was not borne out by the results of this study.

Il est aussi intéressant de noter que la vaste majorité des sujets noirs ont déclarés qu’ils étaient plutôt bien ” dotés” ; une opinion qui n’est pas soutenu par les résultats de cette étude.

Voir la totalité de l’étude :
http://www.sizesurvey.com/result.html

Advertisements